| |
Web URL(s): | http://web.archive.org/web/20021109214221/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study02.htm Last checked: 07/17/2013 |
Publication Type:
| Report |
Author(s): | Martin, S. Bruce;
Jones, William |
Author Affiliation: | Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University |
Title: | Evaluation of Banner and Daconil Ultrex combinations for control of Rhizoctonia blight |
Section: | Plant pathology and nematology Other records with the "Plant pathology and nematology" Section
Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass Other records with the "Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass" Section
|
Source: | Clemson University Turfgrass Program. 1997, p. 44-47. |
Publishing Information: | SC: Clemson University |
# of Pages: | 4 |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Chlorothalonil; Disease control; Fungicide combinations; Fungicide efficacy; Fungicide evaluation; Propiconazole; Rhizoctonia blight
|
Trade Names: | Banner; Daconil Ultrex |
Abstract/Contents: | "The objective was to determine if combinations of Banner and Daconil Ultrex, at 21-day intervals, were adequate to control Rhizoctonia blight. Also evaluated was [were] combinations of Varsity 81WP with Sprint (chelated iron) or either product alone. The objective with these treatments was to determine if additions of chelated iron improved disease control and/or turfgrass quality....The best treatment evaluated in this test was the combination of Varsity + Spring. Surprisingly, Spring alone (chelated iron) suppressed disease symptoms, but turf quality became unacceptable in Sprint-treated plots latter [later] in the trial. Banner 45WP + Daconil Ultrex was not an improvement over Banner45WP alone. Banner MC (now Banner MAXX), was better than Banner 45WP in effective disease control. The Varsity + Sprint combination also provided the best sustained turfgrass quality (Table 5), without noticeable phytotoxicity or development of course textured leaf. The Banner MC treatments provided adequate disease control, but also resulted in a decrease in turfgrass quality...." |
Language: | English |
References: | 0 |
Note: | "SB 671" "Revised March 1997" Tables |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Martin, S. B., and W. Jones. 1997. Evaluation of Banner and Daconil Ultrex combinations for control of Rhizoctonia blight. Clemson Univ. Turfgrass Progr. p. 44-47. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=53561 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 53561. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): http://web.archive.org/web/20021109214221/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study02.htm Last checked: 07/17/2013 |
| MSU catalog number: b5345387 |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |